Alleged Cybercrime: Court Adjourns Natasha’s Trial

The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, adjourned the trial of Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for alleged cybercrime to Feb. 4, 2026.

The matter, which was fixed for today by Justice Mohammed Umar, could not proceed due to the judge’s absence and was, however, fixed for Feb. 4, 2025 for commencement of trial.

The matter was earlier scheduled for Oct. 21, but did not hold due to the protest organised by an activist Omoyele Sowore demanding the release of Nnamdi Kanu, who was recently convicted on terrorism offences.

Justice Umar had, on Sept. 22, fixed Oct. 21 for the hearing after the trial was stalled owing to an objection raised by the defendant.

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on June 30 on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar and was granted bail, following Justice Umar’s adjournment to Sept. 22 for the commencement of trial.

However on the last adjourned date when the prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe, was about to open his case by calling the 1st witness, the defence lawyer raised an objection after a television screen had been mounted in the courtroom preparatory to the commencement of proceedings.

The defence lawyer, Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN, had expressed concern about the possibility of the prosecution opening its case.

West-Idahosa told the court that a notice of preliminary objection to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case had already been filed hence objection is not to the nature of the charge, but the alleged abuse of the prosecutorial powers of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).

The lawyer also complained about not being served with copies of the statements of the prosecution witnesses.

Although Kaswe argued that the objection filed by the defendant should not be allowed to stall the court’s business for the day, Justice Umar insisted that the prosecution must first respond to the objection.

The judge said he intended to first determine the objection raised by the defence before taking any further steps in the case.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, is alleged to have transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intention to malign, incite and endanger lives and breach public order.

The senator was alleged to have, while addressing a gathering on April 4 in Ihima, Kogi, accused the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, of instructing ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello of Kogi to have her killed in the state.

She was also alleged to have, in a television interview, repeated similar claims, to the effect that the Senate president and former governor plotted to kill her in Kogi with a charge brought under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, (Amendment) Act 2024.

Garry Ochigbo, Edited By Grace Namiji