Senate Passes Electoral Act Amendment Bill, Denies Rejection Of Electronic Transmission Of Results

At last the Senate on Wednesday passed the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2026 after a marathon session that lasted for hours and denied rejecting electronic transmission of election results.

The Senate President Godswill Akpabio, after the passage of the bill said the social media was already awash with reports that the Senate has rejected electronic transmission of election results, which he vehemently denied.

Consideration of the contentious amendment to Clause 60, Subsection 3, of the bill began at about 2pm and stretched until 6.26pm, fueling speculations online that lawmakers had voted against mandatory electronic transmission of results.

However, news made the rounds that the Senate shut down a proposal that would have compelled presiding officers of the Independent National Electoral Commission to transmit results electronically from each polling unit to the INEC Result Viewing (IREV) portal in real time, after signing and stamping the prescribed result forms.

According to the reports, the Senate was said to have instead retained the existing provision of the Electoral Act, which states that “the presiding officer shall transfer the results, including the total number of accredited voters and the results of the ballot, in a manner as prescribed by the Commission.”

However, Akpabio insisted that the interpretation was misleading, stressing that the Senate did not remove electronic transmission from the law.

Speaking in a similar vein, Senate spokesperson Senator Yemi Adaramodu told journalists that the Senate did not reject the recommendation of the committee that election results be transmitted to INEC ( (IREV), “real time” to avoid technicality.

Adaramodu also explained that the amendment has taken the power of declaring the runner up the winner where someone who was initially declared by INEC was found not to be qualified to run in the election.

Speaking further on transmission of election results he said, “Distinguished colleagues, the social media is already awash with reports that the Senate has literally rejected electronic transmission of results. That is not true. What we did was to retain the electronic transmission which has been in the act and was used in 2022.

“So please, do not allow people to confuse you. If you are in doubt, we will make our final votes and proceedings available to you if you apply.

“This Senate under my watch has not rejected the electronic transmission of results. It is in my interest as a participant in the next election for such to be done. So please don’t go with the crowd.”

“We have retained what was in the previous provision by way of amendment. That was all we did. The previous provision has made allowance for electronic transmission. So it is still there as part of our law. We cannot afford to be going backwards.”

The issue of electronic transmission of results has remained a sensitive and highly debated aspect of Nigeria’s electoral reforms since the 2023 general election, with civil society groups and opposition parties consistently pushing for clearer and more explicit legal backing to strengthen transparency and public confidence in the electoral process.

Akpabio’s intervention was aimed at calming public concerns and correcting what he described as deliberate or careless misrepresentation of the Senate’s action on the bill, as the National Assembly continues work on amendments ahead of future elections.

The Senate afterwards announced members of Conference Committee that will harmonize the Senate version with that of the House of Representatives.

They are Senators Adeniyi Adegbonmire (Ondo Central, chairman), Tahir Monguno (Borno North), Simon Lalong (Plateau South), Adamu Aliero (Kebbi Central), Orji Ujor Kalu (Abia North), Abba Moro (Benue South), Asuquo Ekpenyong (Cross River South), Aminu Abbas (Adamawa Central) and Tokumbo Abiru (Lagos East).

Meanwhile, the Senate has adjourned plenary till February 24, 2026 to concentrate on the 2026 budget defence by ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs).

James Itodo, Edited By Grace Namiji