Nnamdi Kanu’s Threat To Break Up Nigeria Not Mere Boasting – FG

The Federal Government has told the Federal High Court in Abuja that the threat by the Biafra nation agitator, Nnamdi Kanu to break up the country and establish a Republic of Biafra was not a mere empty threat but a deliberate one.

According to the federal government, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) made a broadcast on Biafra Radio station where he openly and publicly declared his intention to break up Nigeria.

Responding to a No Case application made by Kanu on Friday, the federal government’s lawyer, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo SAN said that the broadcast by Kanu caused Nigerians to Iive in great fear.

The senior lawyer told Justice James Omotosho to reject the claims of Kanu that he had no case to answer in the 7-count terrorism charges brought against him by the federal government.

Awomolo argued that boasting to break up Nigeria is a fundamental security issue to the nation and as such, should not be considered as an empty threat as claimed by Kanu.

The government lawyer informed the court that Kanu in the broadcast directed his followers to go after police men to kill them along with their families adding that over 170 security agents were killed shortly after the broadcast.

“The defendant made a broadcast and the law of Nigeria prohibits words capable of making Nigerians live in perpetual fears, threatening to bring Nigeria down. The aim is to create Biafra and not a mere boasting and there are consequences for such boasting.

Awomolo pleaded with the Judge to reject the no case argument of Kanu and order him to enter his defense in the charges against him stressing that the no case application was a misplaced and misconceived one and Kanu through his lead counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi SAN had faulted the prosecution of his client in the charges and asked the court to discharge and acquit him.

Among others, Agabi said that throughout the proceedings, no single witness was called to tell the court how he was incited by Kanu to take to violence saying that the five witnesses called during trial who are operatives of the Department of the State Service (DSS) admitted that their roles were limited to obtaining statements from Kanu.

Agabi argued that no investigation whatsoever was carried out on Kanu’s statements and no report of any investigation on terrorism allegations was made available to the court drawing the attention of the court to the fact that the charges against Kanu were amended 8 times yet no one came to testify he was instigated to violence.

Insisting that Kanu was only asking people to defend themselves from the wanton killings, Agabi argued that the threat to bring the World down by Kanu was a mere boasting and should not be used against him to justify terrorism offences.

Agabi also faulted solitary confinement of Kanu in the last 10 years in violation of International law that solidarity confinement must not last for more than 15 days insisting that ingredients of terrorism charges were not established throughout the trial,

Agabi pleaded with the Judge to hold that no prima facie made against Kanu warrants ordering him to enter defence in the charges.

After taking arguments for and against the no case application Justice Omotosho fixed October 10 for ruling.

Garry Ochigbo, Edited By Grace Namiji